2003 Montana Legislature

About Bill -- Links

SENATE BILL NO. 397

INTRODUCED BY A. CURTISS

 

A BILL FOR AN ACT ENTITLED: "AN ACT PROVIDING JUST COMPENSATION TO PROPERTY OWNERS IF GOVERNMENT REGULATORY RESTRICTIONS REDUCE THE VALUE OF REAL PROPERTY."

 

BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:

 

     NEW SECTION.  Section 1.  Definitions. As used in [sections 1 through 4], unless the context requires otherwise, the following definitions apply:

     (1) "Just compensation" means payment for the reduction in value of real property and includes reasonable attorney fees and expenses necessary to collect on a claim if a valid claim for compensation is denied or not fully paid within 90 days of filing.

     (2) "Real property" means but is not limited to any structure built or located on the property, aggregate and other removable minerals, and any forest product or other crop grown on the property.

     (3) "Reduction in the fair market value" means the difference in the fair market value of the property before and after application of the regulation and includes but is not limited to the net cost to the landowner of an affirmative obligation to protect, provide, or preserve wildlife habitat, natural areas, wetlands, ecosystems, scenery, open space, historical, archaeological, or cultural resources, or low-income housing.

     (4) "Regulation" means any law, rule, ordinance, resolution, goal, or other enforceable regulation of government.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Section 2.  Compensation for regulatory restriction. (1) Subject to [section 3], if the state, a political subdivision of the state, or a local government enacts or enforces a regulation that restricts the use of private real property and the restriction on the property reduces the value of the property, the property owner must be paid just compensation equal to the reduction in the fair market value of the property.

     (2) Just compensation must be paid by the governing body that is responsible for enforcing the regulation that restricts the use of the private property pursuant to [sections 1 through 4]. In lieu of payment for just compensation, the responsible governing body may modify or remove the application of the regulation from the real property subject to the claim for just compensation.

     (3) As used in this section, the term "governing body" does not include a court of competent jurisdiction.

     (4) For the purposes of this section, adoption or enforcement of historically and commonly recognized nuisance laws may not be considered to cause a reduction in the value of real property. The phrase, "historically and commonly recognized nuisance laws," must be narrowly construed in favor of a finding that just compensation is required under this section.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Section 3.  Exceptions. (1) A regulating entity may impose, to the minimum extent required, a regulation to implement a requirement of federal law without payment of just compensation under [sections 1 through 4].

     (2) Nothing in [sections 1 through 4] requires the payment of just compensation due to a government regulation prohibiting the use of real property for the purpose of selling pornography, performing nude dancing, selling alcoholic beverages or other controlled substances, or operating a casino or a gaming or gambling establishment.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Section 4.  Just compensation -- when applicable -- cause of action. (1) Just compensation is due to the property owner if the regulation is adopted, first enforced, or applied after the current owner of the property became the property owner and continues to apply to the property 90 days after the owner applies for just compensation under [sections 1 through 4].

     (2) If a valid claim for just compensation is denied or not fully paid within 90 days of submittal to the appropriate governing body, a person has a cause of action for compensation pursuant to [sections 1 through 4] in the district court for the county where the real property subject to the claim is located.

 

     NEW SECTION.  Section 5.  Severability. If a part of [this act] is invalid, all valid parts that are severable from the invalid part remain in effect. If a part of [this act] is invalid in one or more of its applications, the part remains in effect in all valid applications that are severable from the invalid applications.

- END -

 


Latest Version of SB 397 (SB0397.01)
Processed for the Web on February 13, 2003 (4:38pm)

New language in a bill appears underlined, deleted material appears stricken.

Sponsor names are handwritten on introduced bills, hence do not appear on the bill until it is reprinted.

See the status of this bill for the bill's primary sponsor.

 Status of this Bill | 2003 Legislature | Leg. Branch Home
All versions of this bill in PDF
Authorized print version w/line numbers (PDF format)

Prepared by Montana Legislative Services
(406) 444-3064