1999 Montana Legislature

About Bill -- Links

SENATE BILL NO. 15

INTRODUCED BY M. COLE

BY REQUEST OF THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

Montana State Seal

AN ACT CLARIFYING THE COMPUTATION OF THE BUSINESS EQUIPMENT TAX RATE REDUCTION REIMBURSEMENT TO LOCAL GOVERNMENT TAXING JURISDICTIONS; AMENDING SECTION 15-1-112, MCA; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE AND A RETROACTIVE APPLICABILITY DATE.



BE IT ENACTED BY THE LEGISLATURE OF THE STATE OF MONTANA:



     Section 1.  Section 15-1-112, MCA, is amended to read:

     "15-1-112.  Business equipment tax rate reduction reimbursement to local government taxing jurisdictions. (1) On or before January 1, 1996, for the reduction in payment under subsection (4) and by June 1 of 1996, 1997, and 1998, for all other reimbursements in this section, the department of revenue shall determine a reimbursement amount associated with reducing the tax rate in 15-6-138 and provide that information to each county treasurer. The reimbursement amount must be determined for each local government taxing jurisdiction that levied mills on the taxable value of property described in 15-6-138 in the corresponding tax year. However, the reimbursement does not apply to property described in 15-6-138 that has a reduced tax rate under 15-24-1402.

     (2)  (a) The reimbursement amount to be used as the basis for the payment reduction under subsection (4) is the product of multiplying the tax year 1995 taxable value of property described in 15-6-138 for each local government taxing jurisdiction by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the jurisdiction and then multiplying by 1/9th.

     (b)  (i) The reimbursement amount for each local government taxing jurisdiction for tax year 1996 is the amount determined under subsection (2)(a) unless the tax year 1996 market value of property described in 15-6-138, for the particular local government taxing jurisdiction, is more than the tax year 1995 market value for property described in 15-6-138 in the same jurisdiction.

     (ii) If the tax year 1996 market value is greater than the tax year 1995 market value for a particular jurisdiction, then the reimbursement amount for tax year 1996 is the result of subtracting the simulated 1996 tax from the 1995 tax. The 1995 tax is the tax for the particular jurisdiction, determined by multiplying the actual taxable valuation of property described in 15-6-138, for tax year 1995, by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the jurisdiction. The simulated 1996 tax for the particular jurisdiction is the actual tax year 1996 taxable value of property described in 15-6-138 multiplied by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the particular jurisdiction. If the simulated 1996 tax is greater than the 1995 tax, the reimbursement amount is zero.

     (c)  (i) The reimbursement amount for each local government taxing jurisdiction for tax year 1997 is the amount determined under subsection (2)(a) multiplied by two unless the tax year 1997 market value of property described in 15-6-138, for the particular local government taxing jurisdiction, is more than the tax year 1995 market value for property described in 15-6-138 in the same jurisdiction.

     (ii) If the tax year 1997 market value is greater than the tax year 1995 market value for a particular jurisdiction, then the reimbursement amount for tax year 1997 is the result of subtracting the simulated 1997 tax from the 1995 tax. The 1995 tax is the tax for the particular jurisdiction, determined by multiplying the actual taxable valuation of property described in 15-6-138, for tax year 1995, by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the jurisdiction. The simulated 1997 tax for the particular jurisdiction is the actual tax year 1997 taxable value of property described in 15-6-138 multiplied by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the particular jurisdiction. If the simulated 1997 tax is greater than the 1995 tax, the reimbursement amount is zero.

     (d)  (i) The reimbursement amount for each local government taxing jurisdiction for tax year 1998 is the amount determined under subsection (2)(a) multiplied by three unless the tax year 1998 market value of property described in 15-6-138, for the particular local government taxing jurisdiction, is more than the tax year 1995 market value for property described in 15-6-138 in the same jurisdiction.

     (ii) If the tax year 1998 market value is greater than the tax year 1995 market value for a particular jurisdiction, then the reimbursement amount for tax year 1998 is the result of subtracting the simulated 1998 tax from the 1995 tax. The 1995 tax is the tax for the particular jurisdiction, determined by multiplying the actual taxable valuation of property described in 15-6-138, for tax year 1995, by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the jurisdiction. The simulated 1998 tax for the particular jurisdiction is the actual tax year 1998 taxable value of property described in 15-6-138 multiplied by the tax year 1995 mill levy for the particular jurisdiction. If the simulated 1998 tax is greater than the 1995 tax, the reimbursement amount is zero.

     (3)  (a) For purposes of this section, "local government taxing jurisdiction" means a local government rather than a state taxing jurisdiction that levied mills against property described in 15-6-138, including county governments, incorporated city and town governments, consolidated county and city governments, tax increment financing districts, local elementary and high school districts, local community college districts, miscellaneous districts, and special districts. The term includes countywide mills levied for equalization of school retirement or transportation.

     (b)  The term does not include county or state school equalization levies provided for in 20-9-331, 20-9-333, and 20-9-360 or the university levy provided for in 15-10-106. It also does not include any state levy for welfare programs provided for in 53-2-813.

     (c)  Each tax increment financing district must receive the benefit of the state mill on the incremental taxable value of the district.

     (4)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in June of 1996 by an amount equal to 38% of the reimbursement amount determined under subsection (2)(a) for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county.

     (5)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in December of 1996 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1996 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (6)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in June of 1997 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1996 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county and by an amount equal to 38% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1997 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (7)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in December of 1997 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1997 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (8)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in June of 1998 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1997 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county and by an amount equal to 38% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1998 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (9)  County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in December of 1998 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1998 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (10) County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in June of 1999 by an amount equal to 69% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1998 for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (11) County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in December of the years 1999 through 2007 by an amount equal to 31% of the reimbursement amount determined in subsection (13) for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (12) County treasurers shall reduce the county payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in June of the years 2000 through 2008 by an amount equal to 69% of the reimbursement amount determined in subsection (13) for all of the local government taxing jurisdictions in the county, as determined by the department under subsection (2).

     (13)  (a) The reimbursement amount for tax year 1999 and each subsequent tax year for 9 years must be progressively reduced each year by 10% of the reimbursement amount for tax year 1999 1998, according to the following schedule:

     Tax Year Percentage of 1999 1998

Reimbursement Amount

     1999 90

     2000 80

     2001 70

     2002 60

     2003 50

     2004 40

     2005 30

     2006 20

     2007 10

     2008 and following years 0

     (b)  The reimbursement amount for each tax year must be the basis for reducing the amount remitted to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 in December of the same year and June of the following year.

     (14) The county treasurer shall use the funds from the reduced payment to the state for the levy imposed under 20-9-360 to reimburse each local government taxing jurisdiction in the amount determined by the department under subsection (2). The reimbursement must be distributed to funds within local government taxing jurisdictions in the same manner as taxes on property described in 15-6-138 are distributed. The reimbursement in June must be distributed based on the prior year's mill levy, and the reimbursement in December must be based on the current year's mill levy.

     (15) Each local government taxing jurisdiction receiving reimbursements shall consider the amount of reimbursement that will be received and lower the mill levy otherwise necessary to fund the budget by the amount that would otherwise have to be raised by the mill levy.

     (16) A local government taxing jurisdiction that ceases to exist after October 1, 1995, will no longer be considered for revenue loss or reimbursement purposes. A local government taxing jurisdiction that is created after January 1, 1996, will not be considered for revenue loss or reimbursement purposes. If a local government taxing jurisdiction that existed prior to January of 1996 is split between two or more taxing jurisdictions or is annexed to or is consolidated with another taxing jurisdiction, the department shall determine how much of the revenue loss and reimbursement is attributed to the new jurisdictions."



     Section 2.  Effective date. [This act] is effective on passage and approval.



     Section 3.  Retroactive applicability. [This act] applies retroactively, within the meaning of 1-2-109, to tax years beginning after December 31, 1998.

- END -




Latest Version of SB 15 (SB0015.ENR)
Processed for the Web on March 31, 1999 (2:29PM)

New language in a bill appears underlined, deleted material appears stricken.

Sponsor names are handwritten on introduced bills, hence do not appear on the bill until it is reprinted. See the status of the bill for the bill's primary sponsor.

Status of this Bill | 1999 Session | Leg. Branch Home
This bill in WP 5.1 | All versions of all bills in WP 5.1

Prepared by Montana Legislative Services
(406)444-3064