Montana State Legislature
HJ 48 - Study of Facial Recognition Technology
HJ 48 - STUDY OF FACIAL RECOGNITION TECHNOLOGY
Legislative Council assigned the House Joint Resolution No. 48 study to the Economic Affairs Interim Committee. The study ranked fourteenth among the polled studies.
The committee held a stakeholder panel to collect feedback on draft bill PD6-HJ48-2 and the idea of a moratorium on facial recognition technology use by state and local government agencies in Montana. Stakeholders invited were the: Department of Administration, Department of Corrections, Department of Justice, Department of Labor & Industry, Compliance Monitoring Systems, Montana Association of Chiefs of Police, Montana County Attorneys Association, Montana Police Protective Association, and Montana Sheriff & Peace Officers Association. The stakeholders provided responses to questions the committee provided prior to the meeting, and answered follow-up questions from committee members. After public comment and committee discussion, the committee moved to submit additional amendment ideas to staff for PD6-HJ48-2 to review at the August 2022 meeting.
July meeting handouts:
- Stakeholder Discussion Questions:
- Public Comments Received on HJ48
The committee held a work session to review two provisional bill drafts. The committee reviewed a memo of draft options and the draft bill for PD2-HJ48-1 and voted on options for additional provisions for the bill. The committee will review an updated version of PD2-HJ48-1 at either the August or September 2022 meeting. The committee then reviewed a memo summary and the draft bill for PD6-HJ48-2, listened to public comment on the bill, and held a lengthy discussion on if it should move forward. The committee requested staff to schedule a stakeholder meeting in July 2022 for further discussion on the direction of the bill.
The committee held a work session to review potential policy options for a committee bill. After reviewing the staff briefing paper, hearing public comment, and committee discussion, the committee requested staff to prepare two provisional draft bills for the June meeting:
- A committee bill to update the advisory council appointment process in 44-5-501, MCA.
- A committee bill to establish general policies for government use of facial recognition technology.
The committee held a Q&A panel for the Montana Fusion Center, Nlets, and ID.me, regarding privacy policies, access to, and security of data, including personally identifiable information and biometric information. The committee also listened to a presentation by Clearview AI on the use of facial recognition technology for criminal investigations. Staff provided a briefing paper on privacy policies for facial recognition in Montana. The committee decided during its work session to request further information from ID.me and the Department of Labor and Industry, who has a contract with ID.me. The committee also decided to begin looking at policy ideas for a committee bill and requested time at the next meeting to begin developing those ideas.
February meeting handouts:
- Legislative Services Division
- Staff Briefing Paper: FaceTime: Privacy Policies for Facial Recognition in Montana
- Memo: ID.me Statement & Follow-up Q&A
- Article: NIST Guidelines
- Case Study: Arizona PUA
- Krebs on Security Article: IRS Will Soon Require Selfies for Online Access
- Insights: Stopping Massive Fraud and Identity Theft with Equitable Facial Recognition
- Handout: Real World Examples of Masks & Dolls Caught by ID.me
- Clearview AI
- Public Comment: Rule 42.39.121 - Licensed Premises - Security Requirements
Work session handouts:
- HJ48 Study Timeline
- NCSL Article: 2021 Consumer Data Privacy Legislation
- Other States' Enacted Legislation
The committee heard from the Department of Labor and Industry and the Department of Justice on how those agencies use facial recognition technology for identity verification purposes for unemployment insurance and within the motor vehicle division. Staff also provided a briefing paper on the difference between facial verification (one-to-one matching) versus facial identification (one-to-many matching). The paper included information on the Department of Correction's use of facial verification software through a contracted vendor's services. After the presentations by the agencies, public comment, and discussion by the committee, the committee requested the following:
- More information on the privacy policies, access to, and security of data by:
- ID.me, the contracted provider of facial verification software for the Department of Labor & Industry
- the Fusion Center, and
- the National Law Enforcement Telecommunications System (NLETS)
November meeting handouts:
- Briefing paper: Facial Verification vs. Facial Identification
- Presentation by Department of Labor & Industry
- Department of Justice handout: Facial Recognition Technology: Responsible Use Principles and the Legislative Landscape. By James A. Lewis & William Crumpler; Center for Strategic & International Studies
- Public comment from Frontier Institute
Study topics chosen by the committee:
- Use of facial recognition technology by state agencies, including uses in investigations and criminal actions in Montana, and uses for unemployment insurance fraud.
- Security of facial recognition data and data sharing among local, state & federal agencies.